...just clicks at URL's pic.. That's life.
Thon Nontaz added 5 photos and a video — with Patcha Nontasut.
1 hr ·
Permit moi vu parles Qui Veut Ça C'est Les Vie..บทสวดมนต์ก่อนนอน แผ่เมตตา. การสวดบทสวดมนต์ก่อนนอนนั้นดีมากๆ ทำให้เรามีสมาธิและได้แผ่ส่วนบุญส่วนกุศลที่ได้ทำมาในแต่ละวันทำให้เราเจอแต่สิ่งดีๆ ที่จะเข้ามาในชีวิต ..อนุญาตให้ฉันเห็นใครอยากพูดมันนั่นคือชีวิต จึง พยายาม เค้น คํา พูด ขอ ความ ช่วยเหลือ,,,,,Merci beaucoup mon ami.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?
Ten Most Controversial Impressionist Paintings
First a few comments that were made of the impressionist’s and their works
The Ten Most Controversial Impressionist Paintings.
The drink Absinthe was given the affectionate name “the green fairy” but was also referred to by the less affectionate name “a ticket to the madhouse”. One of the main ingredients of the Absinthe drink, Thuzone was an oil extract from the wormwood plant and was believed to have psychoactive qualities and was also highly addictive. Absinthe was later banned throughout most of Europe and the USA. More…
A further controversy surrounding the painting Impression Sunrise was that Ernest Hoschede, a wealthy department store owner, purchased it for 800 francs, shortly after the first Impressionist Exhibition closed. Nineteen years later Claude Monet would marry Alice the wife of Ernest Hoschede in a modest ceremony in Giverny, after the death of her first husband.
This painting is a forthright denial of local colour in favour of a wide range of reflected light effects and as such was particularly badly received by the critics. The sunlight, filtering through the trees, produced a mottled effect on the womans torso and clothing.
Albert Wolfe, a consistently vicious critic of the Impressionists, upon seeing this mottled effect, wrote a comment for the popular Le Figaro on April 3, 1976: “Try to explain to M. Renoir that a woman’s torso is not a heap of decomposing flesh covered with green and purple patches, which are the sign of advanced putrefaction in a corpse.“
First in 1978 when on loan in Marseille (recovered a few days later in the city’s sewers). Next in 1998 (in which the museum’s curator was convicted of the theft and jailed for five years along with two accomplices) and for a third time in August 2007. It was later recovered on June 4, 2008, by the French National Police along with three other stolen paintings from inside a van in Marseilles, France.
A letter from Vincent Van Gogh to his brother Theo stated that Vincent Van Gogh believed that Dr. Gachet was sicker than himself. This painting clearly supports Van Gogh’s letter. It portrays in Dr. Gachet’s posture and face with depression, sadness and melancholy.
A Second Controversial topic to the painting was the significance of the branch from the foxglove plant. The Foxglove plant was used to produce a heart medicine called Digitalis that may have been used on Van Gogh to control his seizures. Van Gogh showed some of the side effects of Digitalis poisoning in the halos around bright objects (Starry Night, Starry Night over the Rhône and Cafe Terrace at Night) and a tendency of seeing yellow more dominantly. But these paintings were all painted while Van Gogh was at St. Remy asylum before he was in the care of Dr. Gachet.